Designing Resilient Municipal Facilities: Embracing Microgrids Without Compromising Architectural Integrity

As municipalities face mounting pressure to enhance energy resilience, control operational costs, contain energy costs and/or meet sustainability goals, microgrids have emerged as a transformative solution.

These localized energy networks – often encompassing solar photovoltaics (PV), battery energy storage systems (BESS), and enhanced geothermal with islanding or grid parallel capabilities – help maintain services during grid outages, optimize energy management and empower environmental responsibility. The challenge lies in weaving technologies seamlessly into civic architecture without compromising aesthetics, functionality or community character.

Programming with Intent

Successful adoption begins in the earliest phases of design. During programming, objectives must be clearly defined – whether it’s 24/72 hours of autonomy, tiered critical-load prioritization or how recovery starts after an outage. These choices influence everything from electrical one-lines to room adjacencies and building massing. By embedding redundancy into the DNA of the project, architects and engineers can ensure infrastructure upholds operational continuity without becoming intrusive. This remains true for additions and major renovations – buildings which are planned for resilience from the start can incorporate the infrastructure more seamlessly.

Designing Microgrids to Disappear

Microgrid components can be substantial, but a thoughtful approach allows them to “hide in plain sight.” BESS​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ and switchgear can be tucked into screened service yards, ventilated penthouses or ground-level utility courts that harmonize with the building’s palette. Roof-mounted PV​​ systems can sit behind parapets or in roof wells, while parking lot canopies offer dual benefits – energy generation and weather protection –without burdening roof structures.

Façade-incorporated PV should be used selectively, only when it resonates with the building’s natural form and proportion. Sightlines, scale and acoustics must be considered: setbacks from public edges, green walls, louvers and low-noise equipment help safeguard visual and acoustic comfort for the community.

Invisible but Accessible

Safety requirements for energy storage – such as fire ratings, ventilation and separation – don’t have to come at the expense of design. Battery-ready rooms with rated construction and detailed intake/exhaust systems allow for sequenced upgrades while preserving cohesion. Segmented layouts, including designated spots for critical-load panels and islanding paths, keep electrical systems organized and out of the way.

Maintenance access should also be intuitive. Discreet service corridors and doors prevent operations and maintenance (O&M) activities from interfering with public-facing spaces. Scalability is essential: conduits, pad space and roof zones can be reserved for distributed energy resources (DERs) so that expansions don’t result in unsightly add-ons.

Retrofitting vs. New Construction: Challenges & Opportunities

Existing Buildings

Retrofits face spatial constraints, “inconvenient” structural clashes and dated electrical systems. Tight utility yards, limited roof load capacity and older switchgear complicate additions. Envelope penetrations for BESS​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ ventilation must be carefully placed to avoid egress routes and public areas. Construction logistics – especially for schools or public safety buildings – also demand phased upgrades and coordination.

Yet opportunities abound. Targeted strategies enable municipalities to right-size systems based on vital loads, pair existing generators with hybrid microgrids and add BESS for silent nighttime power and peak shaving. Parking-lot PV​​​​​​​​​​​ canopies bypass roof limitations for quick wins. Controls retrofits and load-flex tactics often produce the best cost-per-kilowatt. Phased delivery—starting with controls and critical-load panels, then layering in PV and BESS – minimizes visual impact and may better align with funding availability.

New Buildings

Ground-up projects, on the other hand, offer a clean slate, though teams must commit early to room sizes, shaft space, roof zoning and service yards that anticipate DERs​​​​​​​​​​​​​​. Without clear owner criteria, energy resilience features risk being value-engineered out.

The opportunities in new construction are significant. Battery-ready rooms, screened utility courts, canopy-ready parking, and PV​​​​​​​​​​​​​​-zoned roofs can be incorporated from day one, along with islandable electrical infrastructure and microgrid controls that improve operational clarity.

Proactive planning – such as providing spare conduits, pad space, and breaker capacity – makes future upgrades straightforward and unobtrusive, while low-noise equipment, integrated screening, and coordinated finishes ensure resilience measures complement the architecture. When bundled with electrification and efficiency strategies, these investments also improve grant competitiveness and lower total cost of ownership.

Architecture as a Catalyst for Energy Resilience

Microgrids give communities a powerful tool to stay connected, slice expenditures and meet sustainability targets. The key is to implement these systems with care – through clear planning, respect for place and long-term adaptability. Whether upgrading legacy buildings or designing new civic landmarks, local leaders have a unique opportunity to create municipal facilities that are equally reliable, effective and enduring – quietly serving the people who depend on them.

lOOKING TO bUILD rESILIENT eNERGY sYSTEMS FOR tOMORROW?

In 2024 alone, CPL helped communities win more than $37 million in grants. As federal policies shift, our team stays ahead of evolving regulations and incentive structures—helping municipalities act fast, plan wisely and turn short windows into long-term wins.